Translation and validation of the drooling impact scale questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese / Tradução e validação do questionário da drooling impact scale para o português do Brasil

Abstract Introduction Inadequate drooling can cause serious clinical, functional and social problems. Validated questionnaires to evaluate drooling impact on quality of life are lacking in Brazilian Portuguese. Objectives To translate and validate the drooling impact scale to Brazilian Portuguese. Methods The drooling impact scale was translated to Brazilian Portuguese and back- translated to English to assess potential conceptual differences. Brazilian Portuguese version of drooling impact scale was applied to a 40 patients' sample of sialorrhea presenting pediatric patients (up to 20 years of age). Chronbach's alpha, exploratory factorial analysis and confirmatory factorial analysis were then proceeded with data collected. Results The mean drooling impact scale value for the whole population was 51.77 (SD = 16.13). The internal consistency obtained with Cronbach's alpha indicated a value of 0.72 for the entire sample. The Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (p< 0.0001), confirming correlation among variables tested. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy revealed a value of 0.72, indicating that the correlation matrix was reasonably suitable for factor analysis. Regarding exploratory factorial analysis, parallel analysis suggested a two-factor solution that was used for confirmatory factorial analysis. The first factor was responsible for 33.78% of the variance with an Eigenvalue of 3.38. The second factor explained 16.1% of the variance with an Eigenvalue of 1.61. At confirmatory factorial analysis, the two-factor model showed consistently better adjustments parameters than the one-factor model. Conclusion The drooling impact scale has been successfully translated to Brazilian Portuguese language, showing adequate internal validity. Validation of this instrument allows physicians and other personnel involved in the care of these patients to perform a better management of patients experiencing drooling. With this tool, we are now able to guide routines and provide guidelines both before and after the different kinds of treatments in order to improve the general well-being of the patient and his family.

Resumo Introdução A produção inadequada de saliva pode causar sérios problemas clínicos, funcionais e sociais. Questionários validados para avaliar o impacto da salivação na qualidade de vida em português do Brasil são necessários. Objetivos Traduzir e validar a Drooling Impact Scale para o português do Brasil. Método A Drooling Impact Scale foi traduzida para português do Brasil e retrotraduzida para o inglês para avaliar possíveis diferenças conceituais. A versão em português do Brasil da Drooling Impact Scale foi aplicada a uma amostra de 40 pacientes pediátricos que apresentavam sialorreia (até 20 anos). Alfa de Cronbach, análise fatorial exploratória e análise fatorial confirmatória foram então feitos com os dados coletados. Resultados O valor médio da Drooling Impact Scale para toda a população foi de 51,77 (DP = 16,13). A consistência interna obtida com o alfa de Cronbach indicou um valor de 0,72 para toda a amostra. O teste de esfericidade de Bartlett foi significante (p < 0,0001), confirmou a correlação entre as variáveis testadas. A medida de adequação da amostra de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin revelou um valor de 0,72, indicou que a matriz de correlação era razoavelmente adequada para a análise fatorial. Em relação à análise fatorial exploratória, a análise paralela sugeriu uma solução de dois fatores, que foi usada para a análise fatorial confirmatória. O primeiro fator foi responsável por 33,78% da variância com um autovalor de 3,38. O segundo fator explicou 16,1% da variância com um autovalor de 1,61. Na análise fatorial confirmatória, o modelo de dois fatores mostrou parâmetros de ajustes consistentemente melhores do que o modelo de um fator. Conclusão A Drooling Impact Scale foi traduzida com sucesso para o português do Brasil, apresentou validade interna adequada. A validação desse instrumento permite que médicos e outras pessoas envolvidas no cuidado desses pacientes façam um melhor manejo dos pacientes com sialorreia. Com essa ferramenta, agora somos capazes de orientar rotinas e fornecer orientações antes e depois dos diferentes tipos de tratamentos, a fim de melhorar o bem-estar geral do paciente e de sua família.

Comparação entre as complicações da lipoabdominoplastia sem preservação da fáscia de Scarpa com abdominoplastia clássica: um estudo prospectivo cego / Complications of lipoabdominoplasty without Scarpa fascia preservation versus classic abdominoplasty: a prospective blind study

Introdução: Abdominoplastia é um dos procedimentos cirúrgicos estéticos mais realizados. Seroma é a complicação local mais comum associada com abdominoplastia, com uma incidência média de 10%. A maior incidência de seroma pós-operatório (PO) ocorre no décimo primeiro dia PO. Ecografia abdominal é o método de escolha para o diagnóstico de seroma após abdominoplastia. Novas técnicas surgiram ao longo dos anos na tentativa de trazer melhores resultados estéticos com menos complicações, como lipoabdominoplastia descrita por Saldanha. Porém, estudos anatômicos recentes questionam a necessidade da manutenção da fáscia de Scarpa descrita na técnica de lipoabdominoplastia, descrevendo que em torno de 90% do sistema linfático abdominal está no plano subdérmico e 10% em um sistema linfático profundo justa-aponeurose abdominal. O objetivo é comparar a incidência de seroma na lipoabdominoplastia sem preservação da fáscia de Scarpa com a abdominoplastia clássica. Métodos: Coorte prospectiva, cega na qual serão analisados 40 pacientes consecutivos que realizaram abdominoplastia sem lipoaspiração associada (n = 20) ou lipoabdominoplastia (n = 20) no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre entre abril de 2016 e maio de 2017. Todos foram submetidos à ecografia de parede abdominal no 10o dia PO. Resultados: A incidência de seroma foi de 5% (n = 1) no grupo de abdominoplastia clássica e de 10% (n = 2) no grupo de lipoabdominoplastia, sem diferença estatística. Conclusão: Estes resultados, neste grupo de pacientes, mostram que não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos.

Introduction: Abdominoplasty is among the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Seroma is the most common local complication associated with abdominoplasty, with an average incidence of 10%. The highest incidence of postoperative (PO) seroma occurs on the eleventh postoperative day (POD). Abdominal ultrasound is the method of choice for diagnosing seroma after abdominoplasty. New techniques have emerged aiming to improve aesthetic results with fewer complications, such as lipoabdominoplasty described by Saldanha. However, recent anatomical studies have questioned the need for Scarpa fascia preservation recommended in the lipoabdominoplasty technique, describing that around 90% of the abdominal lymphatic system is in the subdermal plane, while the other 10% is in a deep lymphatic system near the abdominal aponeurosis. The objective is to compare the incidence of seroma in lipoabdominoplasty without Scarpa fascia preservation to that in classic abdominoplasty. Methods: Prospective blinded cohort in which 40 consecutive patients who underwent abdominoplasty without associated liposuction (n = 20) or lipoabdominoplasty (n = 20) at the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre between April 2016 and May 2017 were analyzed. All patients underwent abdominal wall ultrasonography on the tenth POD. Results: The incidence of seroma was 5% (n = 1) in the classic abdominoplasty group and 10% (n = 2) in the lipoabdominoplasty group, with no statistical difference. Conclusion: These results showed no statistically significant intergroup difference in seroma development.

Mechanical ventilation in patients in the intensive care unit of a general university hospital in southern Brazil: an epidemiological study

OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics, the frequency and the mortality rates of patients needing mechanical ventilation and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a general university hospital in southern Brazil. METHOD: Prospective cohort study in patients admitted to the ICU who needed mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours between March 2004 and April 2007. RESULTS: A total of 1,115 patients admitted to the ICU needed mechanical ventilation. The mortality rate was 51%. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 57±18 years, and the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 22.6±8.3. The variables independently associated with mortality were (i) conditions present at the beginning of mechanical ventilation, age (hazard ratio: 1.01; p<0.001); the APACHE II score (hazard ratio: 1.01; p<0.005); acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (hazard ratio: 1.38; p=0.009), sepsis (hazard ratio: 1.33; p=0.003), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio: 0.58; p=0.042), and pneumonia (hazard ratio: 0.78; p=0.013) as causes of mechanical ventilation; and renal (hazard ratio: 1.29; p=0.011) and neurological (hazard ratio: 1.25; p=0.024) failure, and (ii) conditions occurring during the course of mechanical ventilation, acute lung injuri/acute respiratory distress syndrome (hazard ratio: 1.31; p<0.010); sepsis (hazard ratio: 1.53; p<0.001); and renal (hazard ratio: 1.75; p<0.001), cardiovascular (hazard ratio: 1.32; p≤0.009), and hepatic (hazard ratio: 1.67; p≤0.001) failure. CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study provides a comprehensive profile of mechanical ventilation patients in South America. The mortality rate of patients who required mechanical ventilation was higher, which may have been related to the severity of illness of the patients admitted to our ICU. Risk factors for hospital mortality included conditions present at the start of mechanical ventilation conditions that occurred during mechanical support.